WebThe Ld. Commr. of ITA No.782/M/2024 & ITA No.1969/M/2024 3 M/s. Geetanjali Space Pvt. Ltd. Income Tax (Appeals) has ignored the evidences, proof and the material produced before him. The appellant prays that addition made by the Ld. Commr. of Income Tax (Appeals), amounting to Rs.7,91,00,000/-, based on such erroneous conclusion may be … WebHC insists single-member benches have no jurisdiction even in case of a Judicial member, according to provisions of the RERA. ... The order by the three-member bench exempted the developer Geetanjali Aman Constructions from registering the project with MahaRERA and also set aside the Rs 30 lakh penalty imposed on the firm.

Registration of Real Estate project with the Real Estate ... - Redlaw

WebSep 16, 2024 · The case in concern is that of a developer Geetanjali Aman Construction who had appealed to the Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribunal against an ordered … WebDec 27, 2024 · Geetanjali Aman Construction Vs Hrishikesh Ramesh Paranjpe. Complaint Number 0000691 [Maha RERA] In this case the question was with regards to the … pink camera flip phones

FACTLY - Making Public Data Meaningful

Webthe case was argued by the Advocate for promoter/respondent on the point of registration. At the time of the commencement of the RERA Act, this project was on going ... Mumbai in the matter of '6M/s Geetanjali Aman Constructions and anr. v/s Hrishikesh Ramesh Paranjape and ors", "Appeal no. in SCIO()00672 in WebCase No.2 - Free download as Word Doc (.doc / .docx), PDF File (.pdf), Text File (.txt) or read online for free. hkjhkujolk; WebApr 11, 2024 · Geetanjali Aman Constructions v. Hrishikesh Ramesh Paranjpe [17], the MahaRERA issued a circular on October 11, 2024 [18], under which it clarified as follows: “It is therefore necessary to clarify that the following transactions / projects do not require MahaRERA Project Registration for Agreement for Sale / Sale Deed Registration: pink camera aesthetic icon